Review: Misakura Nankotsu’s Shoujo Planetarium

Misakura Nankotsu is an artist I’m not too familiar with. I didn’t see a lot of artwork from him/her, before the recent scans. On the 1st of July, 2 artbooks were released, Last Resort (ISBN: 978-4-86252-653-3) and Shoujo Planetarium ( ISBN: 978-4-7577-5010-4 ).I don’t want to comment on the content of Last Resort, but be warned if you didn’t see them yet that it contains hentai, futanari and I find it rather gross, so I didn’t get the artbook. Shoujo Planetarium, is safer, though it features some pantsu shot and sexy illustrations. I decided to review it by photo, and I will comment it, and some color issue and the format of these review at the end of the article.

The book open with a nice folded poster of the cover. Now I wonder if anyone try to remove the poster from their artbook. I never did it with my artbooks, only with magazines.

The book is full of page spread illustration, with comments at the bottom, and a margin for your thumb. There is no small illustration. Artstyle wise, Misakura Nankotsu is not that particular, it’s quite generic moe, not that I dislike it much. One good point would be the color, which are really vibrant.

These illustration from what I gathered are from the Famitsu PS, the famous weekly video game magazine in Japan. Judging from the information in the artbook, Misakura Nankotsu put one illustration every 2 weeks. Chance are no one has ever seen them except Japanese who get the magazine. I don’t think anyone get a video game magazine to scan one artwork; there are video game news in it.

I think it must have already striking for people that it’s rather ecchi. Pantsu here and there, girls cleaning your car… One thing I like in the artbook are the theme of the images. They are all from every day life, with all sort of girl’s in different uniform doing different jobs. There is no particular image to disturb this flow. I like fantastic one, but having a focus on every day life is equally as good in my opinion.

The book conclude with an interview of the artist. All in all, it’s a nice artbook, if you kind of like generic moe. The artstyle, while not being overly original, is clean… and ecchi. It also reminds me a little bit of the Uniform Moe Encyclopedia is similar in visual theme, except the artstyle is consistent, which is really a plus compared to the randomness of the encyclopedia.

Now concerning the article; it was my plan to use the scanner instead of the camera. But for big book, it’s very hard to flatten the book, and I usually lose 1/3 of the page. I also had some people telling me that my icon. 02 has color problem, which is true when I compare the images. However, in the current situation it seems hard for me to address this. My scanner is only on 8bits per channel, meaning that in term of color accuracy, it’s not very good. I might invest in a new scanner in the future, so if people has any recommendation for scanner, I’m opened ^^. I just scanned the cover, and tried some new processing. I would like to point out that there is no GreyCstoration Photoshop plugin for Mac, so I guess I will have to compile it one day.

Meanwhile, I had to use my camera. Using camera is a bit tricky, as the paper is the reflective kind, meaning I have to avoid projecting any hard light. I was surprised to see that my room lamp did make some reflection even though it’s quite a diffused light, so I switched it off. I had to use my lamp desk instead. Pointing it directly at the book proved to be inefficient even with a diffuser. My solution in the end was to point upward, and have some reflection diffuse the light. I think I can improve it a little bit again; I just though about being in front of a wall, since the light is coming from the bottom, and the top the page is less lighted than the rest. The photos reflect this different change of lighting. I will try to improve it over time.

PS: Twitter Tool seems to spam again my database…

  1. So cute illustrations ! Thank for this share ^^

  2. Does look like a nice artbook though, generic maybe but lovely nonetheless! Too bad you were unable to scan it.

  3. The art work was a bit generic at the front, but I really though it improved towards the middle and end. Just better drawn in general.

    I’ve never removed a poster from an art book, it’d be the same as tearing a page out to me >_< Magazines are a different story, but since I kept losing them after removing the posters, I've stopped with that too ^^;

    Also, the 8 bit thing isn't the issue. Just about every image you've ever saved online is in 8-bit. Just open any image you've downloaded in Photoshop (even PNG), look at the grey bar with the file name + type on the top of the image and read the end; it'll say (RGB/8). If you were to do your images as 16-bit, you'd have to output and save them as TIFF, PNG, PSD, PDF etc and they would be around 100MB each for 600DPI. So… is that really the way you want to go? XD

    • Merun
    • December 12th, 2009 12:11am

    I forgot to check, but the artbook covers from 2004 to 2009, so with so much time, yeah it improved ^^. Compared to some other artist, it’s subtle.

    Lol, I don’t lose my posters, I put them in a very large file so that they get flattened and are safe.

    For final image, yes 8bit is not an issue. 99% of screen can only display 8bits, or even less. The problem on my scans is that it clearly lacks some information on the red channel. I checked if the light of the scanner didn’t alter the color, but it didn’t seems to. The icon. 02 cover has weird color; her skin looks yellow, while it’s supposed to be a little bit more redish.

    Now it’s only in theory, but higher color depth should be able to catch all these informations that my current scanner missed. Also, for post processing like leveling, I can work on the level without clipping colors on the final 8bit images. Of course, there are other things to take into account for color accuracy, like calibrating the whole acquisition chain, including scanner, screen.

  4. These art books–and especially doujin–are printed in 8bit color, so your scanner can’t catch something that isn’t there. I’d try Vuescan if you want better raws in color to start out with. I remember Icie talked about having an issue with his colors and it turned out to be drivers that needed updating. I’ve had the same experience when changing a scanner to a different computer and even when buying a new one. It just takes some tweaking.

    • Merun
    • December 12th, 2009 7:51am

    I will give it a try then.

    • midzki
    • December 14th, 2009 4:50pm

    hi merun \(>ヮ<)
    you may get troubled because of us, so I’d be of help as possible as I can :3

    there are many scanners which couldn’t catch colors at the sufficient level even adjusted by hands, or softwares. even though the latest models, it can’t be perfect. for example, Canoscan5600f which I used before is the latest canon model, but it’s very reddish and can’t be good without tonecurve adjustment. old 8bit scanners must be worse than 5600f. it8 target possibly ease the hell scanner’s color, but it’s far from good (sometime, become more worse)

    merun, could you show me a raw (without any color profile, or adjustment) scan of the cover of Planetarium?
    using my e-mail, or post it with “test, hold” tags on moe.imouto.
    because I have the same book, I can compare the color distortion of yours with mine, then can judge it’s fixable or not. ( ̄▽ ̄)ノ

    ps; Epson perfection V600 which I’m using now has the most accurate colors as I know. it’s my first recommendation for a new scanner.

  1. No trackbacks yet.